Navigation
Categories
- Assault on Education (141)
- Assault on Science (105)
- Bathroom Wall (12)
- Bible as Science (7)
- Biological complexity (26)
- Book Reviews (19)
- Conferences (3)
- Designoids (9)
- Evolution (61)
- EvoMath (9)
- Humor (30)
- Intelligent Design (131)
- Journal Club (5)
- Legal Issues (16)
- Metatalk (28)
- MustRead (2)
- Quote Mines (1)
- Research News (30)
- Resources for Biologists (1)
- Science and Faith (1)
- Shoptalk (4)
- Steve Steve (6)
- Sticky (2)
- The Wedge (4)
- Their Own Words (2)
Disclaimer
Authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles on PandasThumb.org. Linked material is the responsibility of the party who created it. Commenters are responsible for the content of comments. The opinions expressed in articles, linked materials, and comments are not necessarily those of PandasThumb.org. See our full disclaimer.
Entries
Site Traffic
Posted by Pim van Meurs on June 01, 2005 | Comments (17) | TrackBack (0)
In her ‘response’ toOrr’s excellent contribution in the New Yorker, Denyse O’Leary quotes Luskin
Luskin, an apparent enfant terrible, also challenges Orr on a sensitive point:
I publicly invite Allen Orr to explain to us how his Darwinian view of life interfaces with his personal religious beliefs. Public disclosure of Orr’s personal views would go much further towards reassuring people that it is possible to believe in God and evolution than would his mere citation to a statement by a pope who said that God and evolution are compatible. My e-mail address is .
Any other Darwinist is welcome to do the same, I suppose.
Continue reading “ An Open Letter Concerning Religion and Science”