Navigation
Categories
- Assault on Education (147)
- Assault on Science (108)
- Bathroom Wall (12)
- Bible as Science (7)
- Biological complexity (26)
- Book Reviews (19)
- Conferences (3)
- Designoids (9)
- Evolution (62)
- EvoMath (9)
- Humor (30)
- Intelligent Design (134)
- Journal Club (5)
- Legal Issues (18)
- Metatalk (28)
- MustRead (2)
- Quote Mines (1)
- Research News (30)
- Resources for Biologists (1)
- Science and Faith (1)
- Shoptalk (4)
- Steve Steve (6)
- The Wedge (4)
- Their Own Words (2)
Disclaimer
Authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles on PandasThumb.org. Linked material is the responsibility of the party who created it. Commenters are responsible for the content of comments. The opinions expressed in articles, linked materials, and comments are not necessarily those of PandasThumb.org. See our full disclaimer.
Entries
Posted by Pim van Meurs on June 06, 2005 | Comments (47) | TrackBack (1)
Coyne as quoted by Behe in Darwin’s Black Box:
We conclude-unexpectedly-that there is little evidence for the neo-Darwinian view: its theoretical foundations and the experimental evidence supporting it are weak.
I decided to check the actual text and guess what? In the actual text the period is a comma and the text continues as follows:
and there is no doubt that mutations of large effects are sometimes important in adaptation.
Continue reading “From the quote mines: Behe quotes Coyne”
