Navigation
Disclaimer
Authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles on PandasThumb.org. Linked material is the responsibility of the party who created it. Commenters are responsible for the content of comments. The opinions expressed in articles, linked materials, and comments are not necessarily those of PandasThumb.org. See our full disclaimer.
Recent Comments
- steve on February 14, 2005 10:23 PM
- Wayne Francis on February 14, 2005 09:07 PM
- DaveScot on February 14, 2005 11:01 AM
- FastEddie on February 11, 2005 08:28 AM
Recent Trackbacks
Recommend this entry to a friend
Posted by PZ Myers on February 10, 2005 07:49 PM
Here's what seems to be a relatively simple problem in evolution. Within the Drosophila genus (and in diverse insects in general), species have evolved patterned spots on their wings, which seem to be important in species-specific courtship. Gompel et al. have been exploring in depth one particular problem, illustrated below: how did a spot-free ancestral fly species acquire that distinctive dark patch near the front tip of the wing in Drosophila biarmipes? Their answer involves dissecting the molecular regulators of pattern in the fly wing, doing comparative sequence analyses and identifying the specific stretches of DNA involved in turning on the pigment pattern, and testing their models experimentally by expressing novel gene constructs in different species of flies.

The particular gene of interests is calledl yellow (y), which is required for the production of black pigments (why is a gene for black pigments called yellow? Because genes are often named for their effect when mutated. Break the yellow gene with a mutation, and the resulting mutant animal can't make dark pigments, and looks yellowish.) Yellow is normally turned on at a low level everywhere in the fruit fly wing, pigmenting the wing an overall light gray. In D. biarmipes, there is an additional patch of elevated yellow expression in one corner of the wing. What activates this gene in just that one place?
Continue reading "Evolving spots" (on Pharyngula)
Trackback URL: http://www.pandasthumb.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/807
Comment #16169
Posted by DaveScot on February 14, 2005 11:01 AM (e) (s)
Pardon me for pointing out the obvious, PZ, but a fly with dark spots on its wings is still a fly.
You can rest the defense of mutation/selection in microevolution.
If you come up with observed or experimental evidence that mutation/selection can turn a single celled organism into a fly (with or without dark spots on its wings) then I’m all ears.
Good luck.
Comment #16251
Posted by Wayne Francis on February 14, 2005 09:07 PM (e) (s)
DaveScot, are you not the one that claims that Amoeba dubia, a one celled organism, contains all the genetic information for all life on earth?
Your statement of
If you come up with observed or experimental evidence that mutation/selection can turn a single celled organism into a fly
only would work in your world
In the real world we would need billions of steps of mutation and time for natural selection to eventually get a fly from a common ancestor of even your beloved Amoeba dubia.
Comment #16255
Posted by steve on February 14, 2005 10:23 PM (e) (s)
Creationist Arguments, in Summary:
Wilberforce, 1860: Verily I say, evolution is utterly wrong.
Philip Johnson, 1980s: Microevolution is true, but Macroevolution is wrong.
Behe, 1990s: Micro and Macro are true, except for a few select kinds of Macro.
The reader can draw whatever conclusions his intelligence allows.

Comment #15861
Posted by FastEddie on February 11, 2005 08:28 AM (e) (s)
Duh! The intelligent designer! Or, as Frankie S. might say, “It’s witchcraft, wicked witchcraft…”