Posted by PvM on May 30, 2005 08:09 PM
Gonzalez said this common charge isn’t true and reflects mistaken beliefs about science by its critics.
“They come from a specific philosophical point of view,” he said. “Any explanation apart from law and chance is not permitted in science.”
October 12, 2004 A universal debate By Lucas Grundmeier Daily Staff Writer
What else is there other than law and chance? Ignorance?
Also remember that in Privileged Planet, Gonzalez et al do not eliminate chance and law, only chance. In other words, they accept that laws can explain the universe.
Why is it that ID proponents have no problem accepting front loading in astronomy but insist on intervention in biology?