Navigation
Disclaimer
Authors are solely responsible for the content of their articles on PandasThumb.org. Linked material is the responsibility of the party who created it. Commenters are responsible for the content of comments. The opinions expressed in articles, linked materials, and comments are not necessarily those of PandasThumb.org. See our full disclaimer.
Recent Comments
- joe larson on January 17, 2005 01:28 PM
- Wayne Francis on January 16, 2005 06:56 PM
- Bayesian Bouffant on January 16, 2005 11:56 AM
- Flint on January 16, 2005 11:38 AM
- DaveScot on January 16, 2005 10:14 AM
- ~DS~ on January 15, 2005 01:00 PM
- frank schmidt on January 15, 2005 11:05 AM
- Mike Hopkins on January 15, 2005 08:41 AM
- Wayne Francis on January 15, 2005 06:15 AM
- ~DS~ on January 15, 2005 05:31 AM
Recent Trackbacks
Recommend this entry to a friend
Nick Matzke posted Entry 743 on January 14, 2005 02:23 PM.
Trackback URL: http://degas.fdisk.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/741

Wow.
Huygens success = image = drainage pattern = rivers = rain = oceans.
(From CNN.)
Sometimes a picture really is worth a thousand words and a few billion dollars.
Since I need a few more lines to provide space for the image:
Wow.
Wowsers.
(etc.)
Comment #13780
Posted by Nick (Matzke) on January 14, 2005 02:42 PM (e) (s)
Here is a picture from the surface:
Comment #13781
Posted by ~DS~ on January 14, 2005 02:45 PM (e) (s)
We have a surface level side image going up at UTI any sec.
Comment #13782
Posted by Nick (Matzke) on January 14, 2005 02:46 PM (e) (s)
Yep, the first image was taken during the descent:
Huygens at Titan 2
January 14, 2005This is one of the first raw, or unprocessed, images from the European Space Agency’s Huygens probe as it descended to Saturn’s moon Titan. It was taken with the Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer, one of two NASA instruments on the probe.
Comment #13785
Posted by Nick (Matzke) on January 14, 2005 02:52 PM (e) (s)
Much more on Huygens pictures at Unscrewing the Inscrutable.
Comment #13789
Posted by Frank J on January 14, 2005 02:59 PM (e) (s)
Look close enough and you can see the images of John, Paul, George and Ringo. ;-)
Comment #13797
Posted by ~DS~ on January 14, 2005 03:21 PM (e) (s)
The rocks or ice chunks or whatever look pretty polished on the top surface. I’d guess we’re seeing a layer of floating scum, looks like maybe open ‘ocean’ or sludge plains in the foreground.
Comment #13803
Posted by ~DS~ on January 14, 2005 03:47 PM (e) (s)
Raw images at http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~kholso/data.htm. We’ll have some of the better ones up in a jiffy.
Comment #13807
Posted by David Heddle on January 14, 2005 03:57 PM (e) (s)
Man, I’m at a loss for words. Awesome.
Comment #13810
Posted by DougT on January 14, 2005 04:10 PM (e) (s)
Damn. I’m not getting my work done today because the Titan stuff is so interesting. It’s also great for people on both sides of the evolution/ID debate to be standing in awe of the pictures together. {group hug}
Comment #13811
Posted by Grand Moff Texan on January 14, 2005 04:14 PM (e) (s)
Well, if that image was taken from an elevation of 2 feet rather than several kilometers, I will look rather silly, but if someone has a better explanation than drainage patterns, I am listening.
Well, you could start here.
[ducks!]
Comment #13815
Posted by Nick (Matzke) on January 14, 2005 04:30 PM (e) (s)
Yeah, lots more images. Rivers and ocean, or frozen versions thereof.
Comment #13819
Posted by Bayesian Bouffant on January 14, 2005 04:43 PM (e) (s)
Syntax Error: mismatched tag 'kwickxml'
Comment #13821
Posted by Bayesian Bouffant on January 14, 2005 04:47 PM (e) (s)
#$%@#$%#$% can’t edit posts, can’t insert hyphens in URLS, how far am I suppoed to go for a joke?
Comment #13829
Posted by DougT on January 14, 2005 05:02 PM (e) (s)
Nick-
For some of the images that show the beautiful drainage patterns, have you been able to find out anything about the scale of what they are showing?
Comment #13837
Posted by ~DS~ on January 14, 2005 05:38 PM (e) (s)
Doug,
I could be wrong (I’ve been up for two days}. I believe the ESA said most of the ariel shots are in the range of one pixel to 10-40 meters. Dunno about the side shots yet.
Comment #13839
Posted by Nick (Matzke) on January 14, 2005 05:44 PM (e) (s)
Yeah, they were taken during the parachute descent, so they must be a kilometer or two up at least.
Comment #13859
Posted by Don T. Know on January 14, 2005 08:23 PM (e) (s)
Hey, I think I see an outline of the Holy Mother!
Comment #13866
Posted by Mike Hopkins on January 14, 2005 09:19 PM (e) (s)
Since the above link has 404 errors instead of raw images:
Give me hundreds of raw images
The images are out of order.
Nice to see the Europeans wised up and fairly quickly released raw images. It was not plan a few days ago.
—
Anti-spam: Replace “user” with “harlequin2”
Comment #13867
Posted by Jon H on January 14, 2005 09:24 PM (e) (s)
I think the Mars rovers have spoiled me.
I WANT MORE PICTURES!
All those raw pictures seem to be differently calibrated views of the same thing, or some such.
Comment #13871
Posted by Mike Hopkins on January 14, 2005 09:57 PM (e) (s)
I think the Mars rovers have spoiled me.
I WANT MORE PICTURES!
All those raw pictures seem to be differently calibrated views of the same thing, or some such.
No they don’t. Look again. Skip to the 500s. Remember what I said about them being out of order?
—
Anti-spam: Replace “user” with “harlequin2”
Comment #13872
Posted by Mike Hopkins on January 14, 2005 10:01 PM (e) (s)
—
Anti-spam: Replace “user” with “harlequin2”
Comment #13882
Posted by ~DS~ on January 15, 2005 05:31 AM (e) (s)
Update: 9:53 EST Good review of the Surface Science Package or SSP. Surface temp is a balmy -180 C. Titan has something like a tropopause with a min temp of -200 C at an altitude of 50 kms and possibly a thermocline/ dense cloud layer; ghostly sonic reflections were received from several kms above the surface. Penotrameter data suggests Huygens may have landed in a soft slurry of methane and or water ices with a thin fragile crust. Huygens tilt data indicates a rest angle of about 20 degrees off level, and rock solid steady; no bobbing or wave action.
Update: ESA Systems Science, Damstadt Germany, 6:03 EST AM Jan 15. Data indicates the presence of water ice, methane, ethane, acetylene, and ‘possibly’ other, heavier, hydrocarbons on the surface. In the side-surface shot in the previous frame (see photo two, side-surface view), the objects (ice blocks) are in the 10-20 cm range; they are fairly close to Huygens; the DISR is approximately 40 cm above the surface looking down and out at them at an angle of perhaps 30-45 degrees off level. Optical band wavelength data presented suggests the surface color is a bright yellow with perhaps a touch of orange; almost looks like the hue of raw sulfur in places.
Comment #13884
Posted by Wayne Francis on January 15, 2005 06:15 AM (e) (s)
This is one of the first raw images returned by the ESA Huygens probe during its successful descent. It was taken from an altitude of 16.2 kilometres with a resolution of approximately 40 metres per pixel. It apparently shows short, stubby drainage channels leading to a shoreline.
16.2k and a resolution of about 40 metres per pixel.
Comment #13885
Posted by Mike Hopkins on January 15, 2005 08:41 AM (e) (s)
(Usual disclaimer: camera does not see the same way you do so the colors might not be completely “correct.”)
—
Anti-spam: Replace “user” with “harlequin2”
Comment #13895
Posted by frank schmidt on January 15, 2005 11:05 AM (e) (s)
Composite view at the ESA site:
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Cassini-Huygens/inde…
What a picture. Can’t wait for more.
Comment #13906
Posted by ~DS~ on January 15, 2005 01:00 PM (e) (s)
Udate: 1:52 EST. Rough mosiacs and color pic from ESA via The Two Perecnt Company Rants.
Comment #13957
Posted by DaveScot on January 16, 2005 10:14 AM (e) (s)
Let me be the first to put forward the theory that Titan and Earth descended from a common ancestor.
ROFL!
I kill me sometimes.
Comment #13964
Posted by Flint on January 16, 2005 11:38 AM (e) (s)
DaveScot:
I think Velikovsky beat you to it.
Comment #13968
Posted by Bayesian Bouffant on January 16, 2005 11:56 AM (e) (s)
I kill me sometimes.
Don’t get GWW’s hopes up.
Comment #13991
Posted by Wayne Francis on January 16, 2005 06:56 PM (e) (s)
Let me be the first to put forward the theory that Titan and Earth descended from a common ancestor.
Umm you are way late. Astronomers, cosmologists etc have been saying just this for decades. The Earth and Titan both come from the same halo that surrounded our sun early in the solar system’s formation ~6 billion years ago. Those elements formed from a massive supernova that exploded a bit further in the past. But then you can deny that any systems out there where created via GAs so I’m sure you can deny this too. Please talk to David Heddle if you are in doubt about radiometric dating etc.
Comment #14020
Posted by joe larson on January 17, 2005 01:28 PM (e) (s)
fricken awesome. some of the ones from the decent look like you could add some greens, blues and golds hues and make it look just like flying over an earthly coastline. awesome.
now were are the lgm?

Comment #13774
Posted by Nick (Matzke) on January 14, 2005 02:38 PM (e) (s)
Well, if that image was taken from an elevation of 2 feet rather than several kilometers, I will look rather silly, but if someone has a better explanation than drainage patterns, I am listening.