Timothy Sandefur posted Entry 69 on March 29, 2004 05:44 PM.
Trackback URL: http://www.pandasthumb.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.fcgi/68

Here's a nice news story about the new Teaching Evolution site from UC Berkeley.

Commenters are responsible for the content of comments. The opinions expressed in articles, linked materials, and comments are not necessarily those of PandasThumb.org. See our full disclaimer.

Comment #445

Posted by Matt Inlay on March 29, 2004 7:11 PM (e)

i like what eugenie scott says here:

“Evolution is a science, a fact, and it’s not something to vote on,” Scott said in an interview. “When alternate views on evolution are proposed to be taught, they must be about accepted scientific alternatives, and they need to be appropriate to the knowledge base of the students. Caldwell’s proposal in Roseville doesn’t meet either of these criteria.

“Let’s be grown up about this: We’re talking God in this dispute, not real issues in science,” Scott continued. “That’s what’s really unconstitutional about debates over teaching evolution in Roseville.”

notice that scott first goes after the science behind these “alternatives” to evolution. only after does she bring up motivation. it’s an important sequence that is often overlooked. how much do you want to bet that an IDist somewhere is going to quote the 2nd paragraph and claim that scott is dismissing these alternatives because she thinks they’re religiously motivated, and not based on any scientific evidence?

Comment #447

Posted by Wesley R. Elsberry on March 29, 2004 7:16 PM (e)

I like my money better than that. I’ll pass.

Comment #457

Posted by C. Dickson on March 29, 2004 9:25 PM (e)

Don’t need to bet. It’s already happened - in Roseville.

Comment #15085

Posted by order stock newsletter on February 6, 2005 8:35 PM (e)

buy stock newsletter
from our secure server! get next day delivery free! and save over 70% on all of our popular brand name medications. Delete if you dont like it.